back to main page
For on-line information to help you outFor contact details on your local bureauHow to volunteer with your local bureauTo see what social issues we are currently working on [through advocacy and media]To find out  more about our organisation

 
   
Home : Social Policy Work : Electricity Code Review

 

 

 

Electricity Complaints Commission Code of Practice Review

New Zealand Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux comments to the Independent Review of the Electricity Complaints Commission Code of Practice

November 2002

   


The New Zealand Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Electricity Complaints Commission Code of Practice.

Our submission provides a brief overview of electricity-related enquiries bureaux deal with, we make some observations about companies’ obligations under the Code, and we make a comment on the submission time period.

Citizens Advice Bureau and electricity enquiries

Our 87 Citizens Advice Bureaux dealt with 9,393 electricity-related enquiries between July 2001 and June 2002; a 42 percent increase over the previous year. Table 1 below details the number of electricity-related enquiries bureaux have dealt with since 1998. Over the four years since the electricity reforms our electricity-related enquiries have increased by a massive 400%. Many of these enquiries involve customer problems and complaints in areas of switching, billing, credit policy and disconnections.

Year
Number of electricity-related enquiries
1998-1999
1,887
1999-2000
3,316
2000-2001
6,640
2001-2002
9,393

Observations on the Code of Practice

While the increase in these enquiries is dramatic, bureaux are reporting anecdotal evidence that the Electricity Complaints Commissioner scheme is beginning to have some impact on the way electricity retailers deal with their customers. The scheme has two key elements. The first is the Electricity Customer Code of Practice, which binds members to a minimum set of standards for dealing with customers. The second is the complaints and disputes resolution process, involving the requirement for members to have their own effective procedures for dealing with customer complaints and the Commissioner’s own process to deal with complaints that are not satisfactorily resolved by the company. The results of these two elements are being demonstrated in two ways.

The Code of Practice has seen members put effort and resources into improving the way they deal with customers across of a range of issues, including standards of service, bill payments, bonds, meter reading and disconnections & reconnections. Early evidence suggests that the Code has lead to initial improvements in customer service from those companies that are members of the scheme.

Further, in those cases where customer service has been poor or when the Code has been breached, customers have been able to use their company’s internal complaints processes. And for customers where the outcome to their complaint has not been satisfactory they have been able to have their complaint heard by the Commissioner.

Citizens Advice Bureaux have welcomed this scheme, as it has provided a useful and effective avenue for customers. In the past bureaux have often needed to advocate between retailers and customers, and some companies had not been open to this. The Commissioner is in a strong position to take this role with member companies.

We still hold major concern about those companies who have failed to become members of the scheme; therefore denying their customers that avenue to seek resolution.

The Association is generally happy with the current Code. Indeed, the Association was intensively involved in the drafting of the Code, and we consider that it is a good code of practice. However, we remain concerned with how the industry is currently operating in terms of meeting their obligations under the Code. Our statistics demonstrate customers are still clearly having difficulties with their company, but with time we hope that companies will increasingly meet their obligations under the Code.

Consultation period

The Association would like to make a final point about the period allowed for submissions. The Association has a policy of inviting bureaux input, in terms of feedback based on client evidence, into our submissions. For that to work effectively we require adequate time. We consider that a 3 week consultation period does not provide adequate time for us to provide extensive comments, or seek additional feedback from bureaux.

We were fortunate in this case that we already had a wealth of client evidence provided by bureaux, simply because electricity enquiries have been a major area of work for bureaux over the past four years. We cannot always rely on this being the case.

Therefore we strongly recommend that the Commission provide a longer time period for any subsequent consultations.

     

   



Information | Contact Us | Volunteering | Social Policy | About Us