We
support the recognition of the role of Citizens Advice Bureaux (and libraries)
as information
intermediaries between government and individuals. The Citizens Advice service
enables individuals to access government information in a personal and supported
manner, assisting them to understand the information and the options they have
for dealing with their particular issues/concerns.
The potential for future development in this area for the Citizens Advice
service is in extending
our role as an information intermediary with digital information on the
internet, acting
as an intermediary in the same way as we do with information available in hardcopy.
We support the definition of “infomediary” in the glossary but prefer that
the full term information
intermediary be used.
We support the inclusion (as part of addressing the challenges related to access
to information
on page 30) of an action to “Fund the delivery of broadband access, equipment
upgrades, technical and staff training, and additional staff for public
libraries and
CABs”.
We have some comments on the statement on page 30 that “Essential information
that used
to be published and available from public libraries or CABx is now provided only
in digital
form”. While this is true of some government information, we feel the strategy should
not encourage government information to be made available only in digital form. There
are a wide range of barriers to accessing digital information, and the internet
and information
intermediaries should not be the only options available for accessing government
information.
Creating
the conditions: connection
We
support the inclusion of an action (page 52) to “Fund the delivery of
broadband access
for all public libraries and CABs”, and note that this also contributes to
“content”.
CABs are generally not in a position to become centres where individuals
directly access
the internet – we feel such direct access is best provided by libraries and
others. CABs’
role as “online information centres” would be to access information
available on the
internet on behalf of individuals and support them with interpreting the
information and
their options; our role would not be to provide direct internet access for
individuals.
Realising the benefits
Addressing
the challenges (page 64) states that “Government funding will support the establishment
of e-centres in community locations, such as marae, libraries, homework centres”.
We assume an e-centre refers to a centre which provides direct internet access
to individuals, as compared with an online information centre which refers to access
to information.
We recommend that the terms e-centre and online information centre be defined in
the document
to clarify their meaning and the differences between the two concepts.
We support the development of community training programmes and a nationally
available
ICT infrastructure for community and voluntary groups use.
We note that the strategy includes initiatives for improving general management capability
for the private and public sectors. We feel such initiatives should be inclusive of
the not-for profit sector, including Citizens Advice Bureaux.
RECOMMENDATIONS
That
the terms e-centre and online information centre be defined in the document to clarify
their meaning and the differences between the two concepts i.e.
an e-centre provides direct internet access to individuals; an online information
centre accesses information available on the internet on behalf of individuals
and support them with interpreting the information and their options.
That the strategy not encourage government information being made available only
in digital
form.
That the term “information intermediary” be used rather than
“infomediary” throughout the
document.
That the initiatives for improving general management capability for the private
and public
sectors be extended to be inclusive of the not-for profit sector, including
Citizens Advice
Bureaux.